As the population ages, one of the most important ways to support older adult health is through multi-sector collaboration. Many sectors are now working to promote health and well-being across the life course, including Age-Friendly Health Systems, Age-Friendly Communities, Age-Friendly Public Health Systems, and the aging services network. This comprehensive age-friendly ecosystem ensures the availability and quality of community services and supports that can impact the lives of older adults including access to quality healthcare, affordable and accessible housing, age-friendly transportation options, opportunities for social participation, and work and civic engagement.

This Age-Friendly Ecosystem map tool is designed to enhance partnerships within states by providing information about each of the age-friendly movements across the U.S. Although there are other age-friendly initiatives (e.g., Age-Friendly Universities and Dementia Friendly Communities), this map will focus on:

Click on a state name to see quick data, and access its detailed landing page.

Legend

States not currently AFPHS recognized
States that are AFPHS recognized
States with local health departments that are AFPHS recognized
  • 17.6% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 13.3% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 18% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17.5% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 15.2% of population 65+
  • is an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 15.1% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 18% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 20.1% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 21.1% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 14.7% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 20% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.6% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.6% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.4% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17.7% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.7% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17.1% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.5% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 21.7% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.3% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 18.1% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.7% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.8% of population 65+
  • is an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17.6% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 19.6% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.4% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.5% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 19.3% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.9% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 18.5% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17.5% of population 65+
  • is an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.1% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17.8% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.2% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 18.6% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 19% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 18.1% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 18.6% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17.5% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 13.1% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 11.7% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 20.6% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.3% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 16.2% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 20.7% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17.9% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 17.9% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities
  • 12.8% of population 65+
  • is not an AFPHS recognized state
  • does not have AFPHS recognized localities