Collaboration Across the Age-Friendly Ecosystem
As the population ages, one of the most important ways to support older adult health is through multi-sector collaboration. Many sectors are now working to promote health and well-being across the life course, including Age-Friendly Health Systems, Age-Friendly Communities, Age-Friendly Public Health Systems, and the aging services network. This comprehensive age-friendly ecosystem ensures the availability and quality of community services and supports that can impact the lives of older adults including access to quality healthcare, affordable and accessible housing, age-friendly transportation options, opportunities for social participation, and work and civic engagement.
This Age-Friendly Ecosystem map tool is designed to enhance partnerships within states by providing information about each of the age-friendly movements across the U.S. Although there are other age-friendly initiatives (e.g., Age-Friendly Universities and Dementia Friendly Communities), this map will focus on:
- Age-Friendly Public Health Systems
- Age-Friendly Health Systems
- Age-Friendly Communities
- Area Agencies on Agency/Planning Service Areas
Click on a state name to see quick data, and access its detailed landing page.
Legend
- 18.25% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 14.04% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 19.35% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.96% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 16.20% of population 65+
-
is an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 16.07% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 19.08% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 21.32% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 21.75% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 15.41% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 21.14% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.42% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.58% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.22% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 18.55% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.63% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.78% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.37% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 22.94% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.26% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 18.47% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 19.25% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.88% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.57% of population 65+
-
is an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 18.37% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 20.48% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.23% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.37% of population 65+
-
is an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 20.68% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.72% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 19.95% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 18.58% of population 65+
-
is an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.68% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.09% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 18.79% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 16.7% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 19.56% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 20.04% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 19.38% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 19.32% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 18.45% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.49% of population 65+
-
is an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 13.75% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 12.16% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 22.15% of population 65+
-
is an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.20% of population 65+
-
is an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 17.14% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 21.48% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 19.17% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does have AFPHS recognized localities
- 19.19% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities
- 13.11% of population 65+
-
is not an AFPHS recognized state
-
does not have AFPHS recognized localities